Evaluation of ATP bioluminescence for rapid determination of cleanliness of livestock trailers after a commercial wash.

Pathogens such as porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRSV), and E. coli are known to spread by contaminated vehicles and equipment. Pork producers have adopted trailer wash policies where each trailer is washed, disinfected, and dried before it can return to a farm. Cleanliness of livestock trailers after washing is determined by visual inspection rather than any objective method. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence is used in many industries to provide real-time feedback on surface cleanliness through the detection of ATP from organic sources. That same technology may provide trailer wash facilities a way of objectively characterizing a livestock trailer's suitability to return to a farm after washing. Two ATP luminometers (3M Clean-Trace and Neogen AccuPoint) were used to estimate the correlation between ATP bioluminescence readings and aerobic bacterial plate counts (APCs) from sampled surfaces and to determine locations within a livestock trailer that can accurately estimate surface cleanliness. Five locations in livestock trailers were evaluated. Those locations included the nose access door (NAD), back door flush gate, rear side access door (RSAD), belly flush gate (BFG), and belly side access door (BSAD). There was a positive log-log association between the two luminometers (r = 0.59, P < 0.01). Every log unit increase in one unit, resulted in a 0.42 log increase (P < 0.01) in the other unit. ATP can come from bacteria, yeasts, molds, and manure. There was a poor association (r ≥ 0.10, P ≥ 0.02) between APCs and the ATP luminometers. Still, an increase in relative light units (RLUs) resulted in a corresponding increase in colony-forming units. The greatest area of surface contamination measured by APC was the NAD. RLUs were also greater in the NAD compared to the RSAD, the BFG, and the BSAD (P ≤ 0.01). Because APCs and luminometer RLUs provided similar outcomes, statistical process control charts were developed to determine control limits for RLUs. This provides real-time feedback to trailer wash workers in determining cleanliness outcomes for livestock trailers. These data suggest that ATP bioluminescence can be a reliable method to monitor cleaning effectiveness in livestock trailers. Bioluminescence is a monitoring tool that should be used in conjunction with microbial methods to monitor procedures for cleaning and disinfection.

Characterizing sow feed intake during lactation to explain litter and subsequent farrowing performance.

Variation in feed intake results in nearly 20% of sows consuming less than the recommended lysine (Lys) intake for lactating sows. The Lys requirement for lactating sows is based on litter size and piglet average daily gain which influences milk production. Litter size continues to increase every year causing the need for routine reevaluation of nutrient requirements. If dietary inclusion levels are not continuously adjusted this can lead to inadequate daily Lys and energy intake and may negatively impact sow body condition and litter performance. The objective was to characterize the average daily feed intake (ADFI) of sows and define feed intake patterns and their effects on sow body weight, farrowing performance, litter performance, and subsequent farrowing performance. ADFI during lactation was recorded for 4,248 sows from 7 independent research studies. Data collection occurred from November 2021 through November 2023 at a commercial breed-to-wean facility in western Illinois. Each sow was categorized as: consistently low intake (< 5.5 kg/d) throughout the lactation (LLL); low intakes (< 5 kg/d) in the first week, then gradually increased throughout the rest of the lactation period (LHH); gradual increase in intake throughout lactation with no drop and a peak intake after day 10 of lactation (gradual); rapid increase in intake with no drop and the peak intake met before day 10 (rapid); a major drop in feed intake (> 1.6 kg decrease for ≥ 2 d) any time during lactation (MAJOR); minor drop (≤ 1.6 kg for ≥ 2 d; MINOR). Sows were also separated into low (quartile 1; ≤ 25%), average (quartile 2 through 3), or high feed intake (quartile 4; ≥ 75%) by parity (P1, P2, P3+). Sows in the LLL category were younger in parity, had the greatest preweaned mortality, weaned the lightest average pigs, and experienced the greatest loss in body weight percentage compared with sows in all other feed intake categories. Furthermore, sows in the LLL and LHH categories had one fewer subsequent pig born compared with sows in the other four categories. These data support historical findings that feed intake patterns directly contribute to current litter farrowing performance. Lactation intake patterns also influence subsequent farrowing performance. Identifying under-consuming sows that are likely Lys and energy deficient allows producers opportunities to promote consistent, adequate daily intakes to these groups and mitigate negative impacts on sow and litter performance.

This study investigated different sow feed intake patterns during lactation and average daily feed intakes within parity on current and subsequent farrowing and litter performance. Findings revealed sows that have consistently low intake throughout the lactation period have a significant reduction in average pig wean weight, a greater percentage of pre-wean mortality, and take an additional day or longer to return to estrus compared with sows that have average or above feed intake throughout the lactation period. Specifically, older parity sows were heavier, had greater feed intake, nursed heavier litters, and had litters with less preweaned mortality compared with younger parity sows. The average pig weaned weight and subsequent total pigs born improved as intake increased within parity. Prewean mortality decreased as feed intake increased within parity. These findings highlight the importance of ensuring sows are not only eating enough, but that they are consuming more than average when possible, to continually improve current and subsequent farrowing and litter performance. This study provides important information that will allow producers to target specific under-consuming sows and then promote consistent and high daily lactation intakes. Targeting these potentially nutrient-restricted sows may help reduce negative impacts on sow and litter performance.

The impact of floor space allowance and dietary energy level on finishing pigs, from 65 to 120 kg, on growth performance.

The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the impact of lowering floor space allowance in finishing hogs from 65 to 120 kg when fed high- vs. low-energy diets on growth performance. Eighty-eight mixed-sex pens with 24 ±â€…1 pigs per pen were randomly assigned by weight in a complete block design to one of eight treatments in a 2 × 4 factorial arrangement with two energy levels: low (LE, 3267 ±â€…15 kcal/kg) vs. high (HE, 3389 ±â€…15 kcal/kg) accomplished through fat inclusion; and four floor space allowances: 0.6, 0.63, 0.65, and 0.67 m2/pig. Assigned floor space was accomplished by moveable gates in the rear of the pen which were adjusted at each pig removal until the marketing phase. Pen weight was measured at days 0, 29, and 48, with feed disappearance measured at days 29 and 48 to calculate average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and gain-to-feed ratio (GF). Data were analyzed by pen (SAS 9.4, Cary, NC), as repeated measures, with the fixed effects of floor space allowance, dietary energy level, and the interaction between floor space allowance and energy level. For the overall experiment, decreased floor space had no effect (P > 0.1) on ADG, ADFI, or GF. Energy had a significant effect (P < 0.01) on ADFI (3.17 vs. 3.12 kg for LE and HE, respectively) and GF (0.35 and 0.36 for LE and HE, respectively), and tended to impact (P = 0.08) ADG (1.12 vs. 1.13 kg, for LE and HE, respectively). In conclusion, reducing space allowance from 0.67 m2 down to 0.6 m2 did not affect the growth performance of pigs from 65 to 120 kg. Pigs fed LE consumed more than the HE diets but had generally similar growth and no difference in body weight.